define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
I would be very interested in a comparison of the Pink and REM lines. I’d say the Pink reinforces the centre-periphery commuting patters and some redundancy. The REM provides regular service to low-density urban fringe areas which could in fact reinforce urban sprawl, counter to the overall objectives. I’d be inclined to go with the multi-hub/ urban centre growth model reinforced by the REM. REM + Pink and orange and blue expansion seems too rich, particularly when there are other areas of the country that are way more auto-oriented and need the transit funding more (particularly medium sized cities).
I have just one question, which seems difficult to answer given the images provided: Is it true, as I understand it, that there is only one elevator to provide disabled/pushcart access to the platforms from the mezzanine level? If so, is there also a ramp that is provided?
For a metro system which is running such high-capacity trains at such high frequency (eg., every 2 minutes on the Barcelona trunk line), providing only one elevator for such access would seem to me a major constraint on capacity. I suppose it is possible that the number of wheelchair users in Spain is much less than in the U.S.A., where I live, perhaps because of the better overall health of your population. Regardless, provision of a simple wheelchair ramp would seem preferable to a single elevator, which could be inconvenient, slow, and unreliable.
]]>