define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: Montreal metro cars: Bombardier wins contract, Taxpayers loose
https://www.cat-bus.com/2010/10/montreal-metro-cars-bombardier-wins-contract-taxpayers-loose/
Anton Dubrau's blog about maps, transit ideas and implementationsMon, 25 Nov 2019 20:05:50 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4
By: J B
https://www.cat-bus.com/2010/10/montreal-metro-cars-bombardier-wins-contract-taxpayers-loose/comment-page-1/#comment-7660
Mon, 25 Nov 2019 20:05:50 +0000http://www.cat-bus.com/?p=103#comment-7660The title has a spelling mistake, should be “Montreal metro cars: Bombardier wins contract, Taxpayers lose”.
Loose means not fitting tightly or closely. I think you mean to say lose in this context.
]]>
By: ant6n
https://www.cat-bus.com/2010/10/montreal-metro-cars-bombardier-wins-contract-taxpayers-loose/comment-page-1/#comment-65
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:53:01 +0000http://www.cat-bus.com/?p=103#comment-65I have not considered that dimension of the issue, and neither has any other source I’ve dug up.
On the other hand, despite not being a tax lawyer, I am very skeptical that the difference that caf or Bombardier would have to pay in taxes is significant here.
]]>
By: Joseph
https://www.cat-bus.com/2010/10/montreal-metro-cars-bombardier-wins-contract-taxpayers-loose/comment-page-1/#comment-64
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:14:00 +0000http://www.cat-bus.com/?p=103#comment-64Remember, however, that half the profits Bombardier makes are going right back to the Canadian and Quebec governments in corporate and captial gains tax which is not the case for CAF, so it’s not as bad as it sounds.
]]>